The greater ambiguity, I think, is in which part of the linked document you’re citing. If you want to resolve ambiguity, then use footnotes and quote the relevant parts of the sources.
FWIW, I found the article somewhat cringy, partly because of the references to pick-up artist culture that don’t include the disclaimers I’d expect for practices such as negging: it ends up sounding like the OP endorses the practice.
The other part is that the tone of the article sounds wildly overconfident to me given the evidence presented. A strongly counterintuitive finding needs more justification than a link to an outside source IMO. I’d have taken away more with more in-text explanations and less overall points made.
As far as the pickup-up theme goes, it’s worth noting that the whole article doesn’t say anything about vulnerability and the value of opening up to the person with whom you want to start or keep a relationship.
Would be cool to see more of a summary of “Various relationship skills facilitate greater well-being outside your relationship or they can enhance the quality of your relationship” in this article.
Thanks for sharing this post.
I believe that being in a relationship is important but maintaining the relation with love and care till the end is more important. Couple often fights for small thing and become frustrated with each other. But one thing that should be kept in mind, that they both should maintain a strong bonding between them, so that small fights should not result in major things like break up. People today, take various steps to make their relation strong by avoiding the depression. Voyante sérieuse is a well know clairvoyant who help people in fighting with their depression or sadness and make them smile again, no matter whether he/she is in relation of not. Consulting someone like Voyante sérieuse can help in taking the right decision.
Just personally for me, I would find this easier to read if you linked just a word or a couple of words at a time, rather than a whole paragraph.
under revision
The greater ambiguity, I think, is in which part of the linked document you’re citing. If you want to resolve ambiguity, then use footnotes and quote the relevant parts of the sources.
FWIW, I found the article somewhat cringy, partly because of the references to pick-up artist culture that don’t include the disclaimers I’d expect for practices such as negging: it ends up sounding like the OP endorses the practice.
The other part is that the tone of the article sounds wildly overconfident to me given the evidence presented. A strongly counterintuitive finding needs more justification than a link to an outside source IMO. I’d have taken away more with more in-text explanations and less overall points made.
As far as the pickup-up theme goes, it’s worth noting that the whole article doesn’t say anything about vulnerability and the value of opening up to the person with whom you want to start or keep a relationship.
Would be cool to see more of a summary of “Various relationship skills facilitate greater well-being outside your relationship or they can enhance the quality of your relationship” in this article.
The author of this piece requested that it be removed.
interesting article, thanks for the post, you’ve mentioned the correct points I agree with you Best dating apps
Thanks for sharing this post. I believe that being in a relationship is important but maintaining the relation with love and care till the end is more important. Couple often fights for small thing and become frustrated with each other. But one thing that should be kept in mind, that they both should maintain a strong bonding between them, so that small fights should not result in major things like break up. People today, take various steps to make their relation strong by avoiding the depression. Voyante sérieuse is a well know clairvoyant who help people in fighting with their depression or sadness and make them smile again, no matter whether he/she is in relation of not. Consulting someone like Voyante sérieuse can help in taking the right decision.